mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, Waiman.Long@hpe.com,
	jason.low2@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] locking/rwsem: Drop superfluous waiter refcount
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 09:39:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160509073933.GC3430@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1462769770-29363-3-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net>

On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 09:56:08PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> Read waiters are currently reference counted from the time it enters
> the slowpath until the lock is released and the waiter is awoken. This
> is fragile and superfluous considering everything occurs within down_read()
> without returning to the caller, and the very nature of the primitive does
> not suggest that the task can disappear from underneath us. In addition,
> spurious wakeups can make the whole refcount useless as get_task_struct()
> is only called when setting up the waiter.

So I think you're wrong here; imagine this:


	rwsem_down_read_failed()			rwsem_wake()
	  get_task_struct();
	  raw_spin_lock_irq(&wait_lock);
	  list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &wait_list);
	  raw_spin_unlock_irq(&wait_lock);
							  raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&wait_lock)
							  __rwsem_do_wake()
	  while (true) {
	    set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
							    waiter->task = NULL
	    if (!waiter.task) // true
	      break;

	  __set_task_state(tsk, TASK_RUNNING);

	do_exit();
							    wake_up_process(tsk); /* BOOM */

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-09  7:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-09  4:56 [PATCH -tip 0/4] locking/rwsem (xadd): Reader waiter optimizations Davidlohr Bueso
2016-05-09  4:56 ` [PATCH 1/4] locking/rwsem: Avoid stale ->count for rwsem_down_write_failed() Davidlohr Bueso
2016-05-09  5:36   ` Peter Hurley
2016-05-09  7:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-09 14:29     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-05-09  4:56 ` [PATCH 2/4] locking/rwsem: Drop superfluous waiter refcount Davidlohr Bueso
2016-05-09  7:39   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-05-09 15:56     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-05-09 16:11       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-09 18:51         ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-05-09 18:59           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-09  4:56 ` [PATCH 3/4] locking/rwsem: Enable lockless waiter wakeup(s) Davidlohr Bueso
2016-05-09  7:48   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-09  4:56 ` [PATCH 4/4] locking/rwsem: Rework zeroing reader waiter->task Davidlohr Bueso
2016-05-09  7:50   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-10  1:31 ` [PATCH -tip 0/4] locking/rwsem (xadd): Reader waiter optimizations Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160509073933.GC3430@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=Waiman.Long@hpe.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome