From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: clm@fb.com, matt@codeblueprint.co.uk, mgalbraith@suse.de,
tglx@linutronix.de, fweisbec@gmail.com, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 2/7] sched: Restructure destroy_sched_domain()
Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 12:48:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160509105210.506989560@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160509104807.284575300@infradead.org>
[-- Attachment #1: peterz-sched-kill-sd_busy-1.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1619 bytes --]
There is no point in doing a call_rcu() for each domain, only do a
callback for the root sched domain and clean up the entire set in one
go.
Also make the entire call chain be called destroy_sched_domain*() to
remove confusion with the free_sched_domains() call, which does an
entirely different thing.
Both cpu_attach_domain() callers of destroy_sched_domain() can live
without the call_rcu() because at those points the sched_domain hasn't
been published yet.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -5824,10 +5824,8 @@ static void free_sched_groups(struct sch
} while (sg != first);
}
-static void free_sched_domain(struct rcu_head *rcu)
+static void destroy_sched_domain(struct sched_domain *sd)
{
- struct sched_domain *sd = container_of(rcu, struct sched_domain, rcu);
-
/*
* If its an overlapping domain it has private groups, iterate and
* nuke them all.
@@ -5841,15 +5839,17 @@ static void free_sched_domain(struct rcu
kfree(sd);
}
-static void destroy_sched_domain(struct sched_domain *sd)
+static void destroy_sched_domains_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
{
- call_rcu(&sd->rcu, free_sched_domain);
+ struct sched_domain *sd = container_of(rcu, struct sched_domain, rcu);
+
+ for (; sd; sd = sd->parent)
+ destroy_sched_domain(sd);
}
static void destroy_sched_domains(struct sched_domain *sd)
{
- for (; sd; sd = sd->parent)
- destroy_sched_domain(sd);
+ call_rcu(&sd->rcu, destroy_sched_domains_rcu);
}
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-09 10:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-09 10:48 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] sched: select_idle_siblings rewrite Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-09 10:48 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] sched: Remove unused @cpu argument from destroy_sched_domain*() Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-09 10:48 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-05-09 14:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] sched: Restructure destroy_sched_domain() Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-09 10:48 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] sched: Introduce struct sched_domain_shared Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-09 10:48 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] sched: Replace sd_busy/nr_busy_cpus with sched_domain_shared Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-11 11:55 ` Matt Fleming
2016-05-11 12:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-11 18:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-11 18:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-12 2:05 ` Michael Neuling
2016-05-12 5:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-12 11:07 ` Michael Neuling
2016-05-12 11:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-13 0:12 ` Michael Neuling
2016-05-16 14:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-17 10:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-17 10:52 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2016-05-17 11:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-11 17:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-11 18:04 ` Matt Fleming
2016-05-16 15:31 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-05-16 17:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-16 17:26 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-05-09 10:48 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] sched: Rewrite select_idle_siblings() Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-10 21:05 ` Yuyang Du
2016-05-11 7:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-10 23:42 ` Yuyang Du
2016-05-11 7:43 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-09 10:48 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7] sched: Optimize SCHED_SMT Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-09 10:48 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] sched: debug muck -- not for merging Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-10 0:50 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/7] sched: select_idle_siblings rewrite Chris Mason
2016-05-11 14:19 ` Chris Mason
2016-05-18 5:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/7] sched/fair: Use utilization distance to filter affine sync wakeups Mike Galbraith
2016-05-19 21:43 ` Rik van Riel
2016-05-20 2:52 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-25 14:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/7] sched: select_idle_siblings rewrite Chris Mason
2016-05-25 16:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-25 17:11 ` Chris Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160509105210.506989560@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mgalbraith@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®