From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753634AbcEIXxW (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2016 19:53:22 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f178.google.com ([209.85.192.178]:34978 "EHLO mail-pf0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753486AbcEIXxU (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2016 19:53:20 -0400 From: Steve Muckle X-Google-Original-From: Steve Muckle Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 16:53:16 -0700 To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Peter Zijlstra , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PM list , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Viresh Kumar , Srinivas Pandruvada , Steve Muckle Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Invoke cpufreq hooks for CONFIG_SMP unset Message-ID: <20160509235316.GA30310@sky.smuckle.net> References: <6282396.VVEdgVYxO3@vostro.rjw.lan> <20160507061310.GA15728@worktop.ger.corp.intel.com> <20160507063051.GA23722@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160507063051.GA23722@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 08:30:51AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 02:58:43PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > > > Commit 34e2c555f3e1 (cpufreq: Add mechanism for registering utilization > > > update callbacks) overlooked the fact that update_load_avg(), where > > > CFS invokes cpufreq utilization update hooks, becomes an empty stub for > > > CONFIG_SMP unset. In consequence, if CONFIG_SMP is not set, cpufreq > > > governors are never invoked from CFS and they do not have a chance to > > > evaluate CPU performace levels and update them often enough. Needless > > > to say, things don't work as expected then. > > > > > > Fix the problem by making the !CONFIG_SMP stub of update_load_avg() > > > invoke cpufreq update hooks too. > > > > > > Fixes: 34e2c555f3e1 (cpufreq: Add mechanism for registering utilization update callbacks) > > > Reported-by: Steve Muckle > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > Rafael; feel free to push this through the pm tree. > > > > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) > > I already have it in sched/urgent. Looks like this just missed 4.6-rc7 and the release email for that doesn't suggest an rc8, as it stands...