mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	byungchul.park@lge.com, Andrew Hunter <ahh@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] sched,fair: Move record_wakee()
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 19:43:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160510174613.821444209@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160510174314.355953085@infradead.org>

[-- Attachment #1: peterz-sched-frob-record-wakee.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3982 bytes --]

Since I want to make ->task_woken() conditional on the task getting
migrated, we cannot use it to call record_wakee().

Move it to select_task_rq_fair(), which gets called in almost all the
same conditions. The only exception is if the woken task (@p) is
cpu-bound (as per the nr_cpus_allowed test in select_task_rq()).

Cc: Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: byungchul.park@lge.com
Cc: Andrew Hunter <ahh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c |   61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4811,24 +4811,6 @@ static unsigned long cpu_avg_load_per_ta
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void record_wakee(struct task_struct *p)
-{
-	/*
-	 * Rough decay (wiping) for cost saving, don't worry
-	 * about the boundary, really active task won't care
-	 * about the loss.
-	 */
-	if (time_after(jiffies, current->wakee_flip_decay_ts + HZ)) {
-		current->wakee_flips >>= 1;
-		current->wakee_flip_decay_ts = jiffies;
-	}
-
-	if (current->last_wakee != p) {
-		current->last_wakee = p;
-		current->wakee_flips++;
-	}
-}
-
 static void task_waking_fair(struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
@@ -4848,7 +4830,6 @@ static void task_waking_fair(struct task
 #endif
 
 	se->vruntime -= min_vruntime;
-	record_wakee(p);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
@@ -4966,17 +4947,39 @@ static long effective_load(struct task_g
 
 #endif
 
+static void record_wakee(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Only decay a single time; tasks that have less then 1 wakeup per
+	 * jiffy will not have built up many flips.
+	 */
+	if (time_after(jiffies, current->wakee_flip_decay_ts + HZ)) {
+		current->wakee_flips >>= 1;
+		current->wakee_flip_decay_ts = jiffies;
+	}
+
+	if (current->last_wakee != p) {
+		current->last_wakee = p;
+		current->wakee_flips++;
+	}
+}
+
 /*
  * Detect M:N waker/wakee relationships via a switching-frequency heuristic.
+ *
  * A waker of many should wake a different task than the one last awakened
- * at a frequency roughly N times higher than one of its wakees.  In order
- * to determine whether we should let the load spread vs consolodating to
- * shared cache, we look for a minimum 'flip' frequency of llc_size in one
- * partner, and a factor of lls_size higher frequency in the other.  With
- * both conditions met, we can be relatively sure that the relationship is
- * non-monogamous, with partner count exceeding socket size.  Waker/wakee
- * being client/server, worker/dispatcher, interrupt source or whatever is
- * irrelevant, spread criteria is apparent partner count exceeds socket size.
+ * at a frequency roughly N times higher than one of its wakees.
+ *
+ * In order to determine whether we should let the load spread vs consolidating
+ * to shared cache, we look for a minimum 'flip' frequency of llc_size in one
+ * partner, and a factor of lls_size higher frequency in the other.
+ *
+ * With both conditions met, we can be relatively sure that the relationship is
+ * non-monogamous, with partner count exceeding socket size.
+ *
+ * Waker/wakee being client/server, worker/dispatcher, interrupt source or
+ * whatever is irrelevant, spread criteria is apparent partner count exceeds
+ * socket size.
  */
 static int wake_wide(struct task_struct *p)
 {
@@ -5281,8 +5284,10 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *
 	int want_affine = 0;
 	int sync = wake_flags & WF_SYNC;
 
-	if (sd_flag & SD_BALANCE_WAKE)
+	if (sd_flag & SD_BALANCE_WAKE) {
+		record_wakee(p);
 		want_affine = !wake_wide(p) && cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tsk_cpus_allowed(p));
+	}
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	for_each_domain(cpu, tmp) {

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-10 17:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-10 17:43 [PATCH 0/3] sched: Fix wakeup preemption regression Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-10 17:43 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-05-12 10:27   ` [PATCH 1/3] sched,fair: Move record_wakee() Matt Fleming
2016-05-12 10:31     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] sched,fair: Fix local starvation Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-10 20:21   ` Ingo Molnar
2016-05-10 22:23     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-20 21:24   ` Matt Fleming
2016-05-21 14:04   ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-21 19:00     ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-22  7:00       ` [patch] sched/fair: Move se->vruntime normalization state into struct sched_entity Mike Galbraith
2016-05-22  9:36         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-22  9:52           ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-22 10:33           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-23  9:19         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-23  9:40           ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-23 10:13             ` Wanpeng Li
2016-05-23 10:26               ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-23 12:28             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-25  7:12           ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched/core: Fix remote wakeups tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-22  6:50     ` [PATCH 2/3] sched,fair: Fix local starvation Wanpeng Li
2016-05-22  7:15       ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-22  7:27         ` Wanpeng Li
2016-05-22  7:32           ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-22  7:42             ` Wanpeng Li
2016-05-22  8:04               ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-22  8:24                 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-05-22  8:39                   ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-22  8:50                     ` Wanpeng Li
2016-05-10 17:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] sched: Kill sched_class::task_waking Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-11  5:55 ` [PATCH 0/3] sched: Fix wakeup preemption regression Mike Galbraith
2016-05-12  9:56 ` Pavan Kondeti
2016-05-12 10:52 ` Matt Fleming

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160510174613.821444209@infradead.org \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ahh@google.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=pkondeti@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®