From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752219AbcEKKji (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 May 2016 06:39:38 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:50783 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751320AbcEKKjh (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 May 2016 06:39:37 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 11:39:29 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: David Daney Cc: Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Mark Rutland , Tony Luck , Fenghua Yu , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Rob Herring , Frank Rowand , Grant Likely , Robert Moore , Lv Zheng , Hanjun Guo , Marc Zyngier , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devel@acpica.org, Robert Richter , Ganapatrao Kulkarni , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Daney Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 13/14] arm64, acpi, numa: NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT Message-ID: <20160511103929.GC3051@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1461780436-27182-1-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> <1461780436-27182-14-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1461780436-27182-14-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:07:15AM -0700, David Daney wrote: > +static int __init get_mpidr_in_madt(int acpi_id, u64 *mpidr) > +{ > + unsigned long madt_end, entry; > + struct acpi_table_madt *madt; > + acpi_size tbl_size; > + > + if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_get_table_with_size(ACPI_SIG_MADT, 0, > + (struct acpi_table_header **)&madt, &tbl_size))) > + return -ENODEV; > + > + entry = (unsigned long)madt; > + madt_end = entry + madt->header.length; > + > + /* Parse all entries looking for a match. */ > + entry += sizeof(struct acpi_table_madt); > + while (entry + sizeof(struct acpi_subtable_header) < madt_end) { > + struct acpi_subtable_header *header = > + (struct acpi_subtable_header *)entry; > + > + if (header->type == ACPI_MADT_TYPE_GENERIC_INTERRUPT) { > + struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *gicc = > + container_of(header, > + struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt, header); > + > + if ((gicc->flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED) && > + (gicc->uid == acpi_id)) { > + *mpidr = gicc->arm_mpidr; > + early_acpi_os_unmap_memory(madt, tbl_size); > + return 0; > + } > + } > + entry += header->length; > + } > + > + early_acpi_os_unmap_memory(madt, tbl_size); > + return -ENODEV; > +} > + > +/* Callback for Proximity Domain -> ACPI processor UID mapping */ > +void __init acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa) > +{ > + int pxm, node; > + u64 mpidr; > + > + if (srat_disabled()) > + return; > + > + if (pa->header.length < sizeof(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity)) { > + pr_err("SRAT: Invalid SRAT header length: %d\n", > + pa->header.length); > + bad_srat(); > + return; > + } > + > + if (!(pa->flags & ACPI_SRAT_GICC_ENABLED)) > + return; > + > + if (cpus_in_srat >= NR_CPUS) { > + pr_warn_once("SRAT: cpu_to_node_map[%d] is too small, may not be able to use all cpus\n", > + NR_CPUS); > + return; > + } > + > + pxm = pa->proximity_domain; > + node = acpi_map_pxm_to_node(pxm); > + > + if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE || node >= MAX_NUMNODES) { > + pr_err("SRAT: Too many proximity domains %d\n", pxm); > + bad_srat(); > + return; > + } > + > + if (get_mpidr_in_madt(pa->acpi_processor_uid, &mpidr)) { > + pr_err("SRAT: PXM %d with ACPI ID %d has no valid MPIDR in MADT\n", > + pxm, pa->acpi_processor_uid); > + bad_srat(); > + return; > + } I wonder whether you could replace the get_mpidr_in_madt() function with something like acpi_get_phys_id(). It looks like get_mpidr_in_madt() duplicates functionality already available elsewhere. -- Catalin