From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932341AbcERTNg (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 18 May 2016 15:13:36 -0400
Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.180.65]:40229 "EHLO relay.sgi.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753751AbcERTNe (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 18 May 2016 15:13:34 -0400
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 14:13:32 -0500
From: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
To: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>, Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>,
        Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] x86/UV, x86/efi: Re-factor efi_call_virt for
 general use
Message-ID: <20160518191332.GE242721@stormcage.americas.sgi.com>
References: <1463598701-178201-1-git-send-email-athorlton@sgi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1463598701-178201-1-git-send-email-athorlton@sgi.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 02:11:38PM -0500, Alex Thorlton wrote:
> Let me know what everybody thinks!

I realized right as I sent these that I should've included prefixes on
the individual patches.  I have a feeling we'll need a v2 anyways, so
I'll clean that up then.

- Alex