mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86: Pass kernel thread parameters in fork_frame
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 10:23:35 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160523152335.gax7icvauxohyf3o@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1463846691-18498-5-git-send-email-brgerst@gmail.com>

On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 12:04:51PM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> @@ -405,37 +405,29 @@ END(__switch_to_asm)
>   * A newly forked process directly context switches into this address.
>   *
>   * rax: prev task we switched from
> + * rbx: kernel thread func
> + * r12: kernel thread arg
>   */
>  ENTRY(ret_from_fork)
>  	movq	%rax, %rdi
>  	call	schedule_tail			/* rdi: 'prev' task parameter */
>  
> -	testb	$3, CS(%rsp)			/* from kernel_thread? */
> +	testq	%rbx, %rbx			/* from kernel_thread? */
>  	jnz	1f
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * We came from kernel_thread.  This code path is quite twisted, and
> -	 * someone should clean it up.
> -	 *
> -	 * copy_thread_tls stashes the function pointer in RBX and the
> -	 * parameter to be passed in RBP.  The called function is permitted
> -	 * to call do_execve and thereby jump to user mode.
> -	 */
> -	movq	RBP(%rsp), %rdi
> -	call	*RBX(%rsp)
> -	movq	%rax, RAX(%rsp)
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Fall through as though we're exiting a syscall.  This makes a
> -	 * twisted sort of sense if we just called do_execve.
> -	 */
> -
> -1:
> +2:
>  	movq	%rsp, %rdi
>  	call	syscall_return_slowpath	/* returns with IRQs disabled */
>  	TRACE_IRQS_ON			/* user mode is traced as IRQS on */
>  	SWAPGS
>  	jmp	restore_regs_and_iret
> +
> +1:
> +	/* kernel thread */
> +	movq	%r12, %rdi
> +	call	*%rbx
> +	movq	%rax, RAX(%rsp)
> +	jmp	2b
>  END(ret_from_fork)

It seems really surprising that a kernel thread would be returning to
user space.  It would probably be a good idea to preserve the existing
comments about that.

-- 
Josh

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-05-23 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-21 16:04 [PATCH 0/4] x86: Rewrite switch_to() Brian Gerst
2016-05-21 16:04 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86: Save return value from kernel_thread Brian Gerst
2016-05-22  1:44   ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-05-22  2:19     ` Brian Gerst
2016-05-21 16:04 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86-32, kgdb: Don't use thread.ip in sleeping_thread_to_gdb_regs() Brian Gerst
2016-05-23 17:05   ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-05-21 16:04 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86: Rewrite switch_to() code Brian Gerst
2016-05-22 17:59   ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-05-22 19:31     ` Brian Gerst
2016-05-22 21:07       ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-05-23  2:34     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-05-23  4:47       ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-05-23 11:40         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-05-23 11:49           ` Brian Gerst
2016-05-23 12:05             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-05-23 11:14       ` Brian Gerst
2016-05-23 11:47         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-05-23 11:49           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-05-23 16:46             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-05-23 17:03               ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-05-23 18:44                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-12 14:16                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-06-15  1:31   ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-15  8:03     ` Ingo Molnar
2016-06-15 11:52       ` Brian Gerst
2016-05-21 16:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86: Pass kernel thread parameters in fork_frame Brian Gerst
2016-05-22 18:01   ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-05-22 19:21     ` Brian Gerst
2016-05-23 15:23   ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2016-05-23 15:36     ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-05-23 21:04       ` Brian Gerst

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160523152335.gax7icvauxohyf3o@treble \
    --to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®