From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751391AbcE2FWX (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sun, 29 May 2016 01:22:23 -0400
Received: from science.sciencehorizons.net ([71.41.210.147]:41327 "HELO
	ns.sciencehorizons.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with SMTP id S1751066AbcE2FWW (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 29 May 2016 01:22:22 -0400
Date: 29 May 2016 01:22:20 -0400
Message-ID: <20160529052220.25733.qmail@ns.sciencehorizons.net>
From: "George Spelvin" <linux@sciencehorizons.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@roeck-us.net,
        linux@sciencehorizons.net, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Build errors in mainline due to "fs/namei.c:,Add hashlen_string() function"
In-Reply-To: <574A7B8B.5080200@roeck-us.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> Reverting 468a9428521e, 2a18da7a9c78, and fcfd2fbf22d2 fixed the problem
> for me in a couple of test builds, but I don't know if all three patches
> need to be reverted, or if reverting those patches fixes the problem for
> all builds, or if the revert is sufficient.

Oh, fuck me so fucking hard.

the function is there, just when I renamed it from "hash_string"
I only did one copy.

Find hash_string() and rename it (and the EXPORT).

Patch coming ASAP.

Sorry.