From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161564AbcE3QOH (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 May 2016 12:14:07 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:55228 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933000AbcE3QOE (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 May 2016 12:14:04 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 17:13:50 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Christer Weinigel Cc: Frank Rowand , Mark Rutland , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20160530161350.GR29837@sirena.org.uk> References: <1464107960-10775-1-git-send-email-christer@weinigel.se> <20160524174140.GE11605@leverpostej> <5744BC76.9090403@gmail.com> <20160525092034.GE1337@leverpostej> <5745C5A3.6060202@gmail.com> <20160525174809.GA8206@sirena.org.uk> <5745F30B.2040605@gmail.com> <20160527183629.GO16172@sirena.org.uk> <574A063D.5030700@weinigel.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XAEV7zm15O60d1Zf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <574A063D.5030700@weinigel.se> X-Cookie: Happy feast of the pig! User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:348:6:8808:fab::3 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] devicetree - document using aliases to set spi bus number. X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --XAEV7zm15O60d1Zf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 10:57:33PM +0200, Christer Weinigel wrote: > On 05/27/2016 08:36 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > It is reasonable to provide and document something here but when there's > > some fairly simple and obvious better things we could be doing it should > > be those rather than the legacy stuff. > So what are the "simple and obvious better things" that one can use instead? To repeat what Rob said adding a label property on the leaf device nodes seems like a more sensible option. --XAEV7zm15O60d1Zf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXTGa9AAoJECTWi3JdVIfQWEIH/ikj28e4OS0RlFRM6k/mtZ/W YdEXx9EWxJjtFamqqOujurgctktvEtTOLSd8PuUcQZ6qD7bsjxYLyiU8LD6TLfOC ErxLKC55TH1XnMFmnBb8zktvJMtt4Rcbi6uy/dBydmuJGLw+LG0nL/RYzw5ZTngr nFGMI2Fmsg73Pq44asWRzW6lSpYMZ9piKrrBnWnOdLNUqXB8tWZt5NVMrsz3m9B4 ybWg/4xu2WtuPBAxL6yPDTayOQGhWlNc3pQS/IYJUIgrCRfE503hfh7OpMKl3sIQ Xo+ycLIVCo8RS1DRtrqn3GuNNjshzcVCHtjTlj43Zs13SVhz1NIVutKkg77G5fw= =BfZp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XAEV7zm15O60d1Zf--