From: Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@gmail.com>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"open list:ABI/API" <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:DRM DRIVERS" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:VIRTIO CORE,
NET..." <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add virtio gpu driver.
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 10:00:41 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160531100041.22293fb1@eldfell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464676160.5978.24.camel@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1967 bytes --]
On Tue, 31 May 2016 08:29:20 +0200
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > Why attach the hotspot to the plane? Wouldn't it make more sense to
> > > make it a framebuffer property?
> >
> > We don't have properties on the framebuffer. I guess you /could/ just add
> > it internally to struct drm_framebuffer, and not bother exposing to
> > userspace. I guess that would be a lot simpler,
>
> Yes. I can simply stick the hotspot into drm_framebuffer in
> drm_mode_cursor_universal() and pick up the values in the driver's plane
> update function.
>
> > but it also means that
> > atomic userspace can't use hotspots before we add properties to fbs. And
> > doing that is a bit tricky since drm_framebuffer objects are meant to be
> > invariant - this assumption is deeply in-grained into the code all over
> > the place, everything just compares pointers when semantically it means to
> > compare the entire fb (including backing storage pointer/offsets and
> > everything).
>
> Hmm, the hotspot location for a given cursor image is invariant too, so
> I don't think that would be a big issue.
>
> I'd expect userspace define a bunch of cursors, then switch between them
> (instead of defining a single cursor, then constantly updating it).
Except updating a single cursor (well, two alternating buffers) is
exactly what Weston does, since there is no "set of cursors". On
Wayland, a cursor is just a regular surface like any other with
arbitrary content from a client, except it happens to be associated
with a pointer device.
Furthermore, in Weston a cursor plane is not special in any way. *Any*
client surface can go on the cursor plane if it fits. Universal planes,
and all that.
That's one existing userspace. I suppose that is sub-optimal for
virtual drivers, isn't it? But what else could Weston do without having
separate paths for "normal DRM" vs. "virtual DRM"?
Thanks,
pq
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 811 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-31 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-24 16:07 Gerd Hoffmann
2015-03-24 16:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-25 14:52 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2015-03-25 15:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-25 15:37 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2015-03-25 17:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-26 7:12 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2015-03-26 8:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-26 8:42 ` [virtio-dev] " Gerd Hoffmann
2015-03-26 9:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-26 11:38 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2015-03-26 11:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-26 15:07 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2015-03-26 16:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-27 8:08 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2015-03-24 16:50 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-03-25 14:53 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2015-03-26 8:53 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-03-30 12:23 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2015-03-30 14:49 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-25 16:40 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-25 16:44 ` Emil Velikov
2016-05-27 7:48 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2016-05-27 9:03 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-30 13:50 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2016-05-30 14:47 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-31 6:29 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2016-05-31 6:55 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-31 7:00 ` Pekka Paalanen [this message]
2015-03-24 17:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-24 20:47 ` Paul Bolle
2015-03-24 22:50 ` Daniel Stone
2015-03-25 0:00 ` Dave Airlie
2015-03-25 15:19 ` Gerd Hoffmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160531100041.22293fb1@eldfell \
--to=ppaalanen@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome