From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756152AbcEaTHL (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2016 15:07:11 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:48646 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755955AbcEaTHK (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2016 15:07:10 -0400 Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 12:07:08 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: Minchan Kim , Joonsoo Kim , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sergey Senozhatsky Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] zram: switch to crypto api Message-Id: <20160531120708.b887c44f1f7d9bb536ad2c45@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20160531122918.GA612@swordfish> References: <20160531122017.2878-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> <20160531122918.GA612@swordfish> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 31 May 2016 21:29:18 +0900 Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > forgot to attach some benchmarks: > > (x86_64, 4GB, zram-perf script) > > perf reported run-time fio (max jobs=3) > > test-fio-zram-842 > 197.907655282 seconds time elapsed > 201.623142884 seconds time elapsed > 226.854291345 seconds time elapsed > test-fio-zram-DEFLATE > 253.259516155 seconds time elapsed > 258.148563401 seconds time elapsed > 290.251909365 seconds time elapsed > test-fio-zram-LZ4 > 27.022598717 seconds time elapsed > 29.580522717 seconds time elapsed > 33.293463430 seconds time elapsed > test-fio-zram-LZ4HC > 56.393954615 seconds time elapsed > 74.904659747 seconds time elapsed > 101.940998564 seconds time elapsed > test-fio-zram-LZO > 28.155948075 seconds time elapsed > 30.390036330 seconds time elapsed > 34.455773159 seconds time elapsed I'm having trouble understanding the benchmark results. What is being compared to what and which was faster and how much?