mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com>,
	viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] mutex: Optimize mutex_trylock() fast-path
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 06:27:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160602132724.GG5231@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160601185815.GW3190@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 08:58:15PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> A while back Viro posted a number of 'interesting' mutex_is_locked()
> users on IRC, one of those was RCU.
> 
> RCU seems to use mutex_is_locked() to avoid doing mutex_trylock(), the
> regular load before modify pattern.

Definitely -- the old versions of mutex_trylock() looked to take ownership
of the cacheline, which most definitely is not what you want if you have
a bunch of CPUs doing expedited grace periods concurrently.

> While the use isn't wrong per se, its curious in that its needed at all,
> mutex_trylock() should be good enough on its own to avoid the pointless
> cacheline bounces.
> 
> So fix those and remove the mutex_is_locked() (ab)use from RCU.

Given the changes below that push the mutex_is_locked() check into
mutex_trylock():

Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Or I could pull the changes into -rcu if you prefer.

							Thanx, Paul

> Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
>  arch/ia64/include/asm/mutex.h    | 2 +-
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/mutex.h | 2 +-
>  arch/x86/include/asm/mutex_32.h  | 2 +-
>  arch/x86/include/asm/mutex_64.h  | 6 +++---
>  include/asm-generic/mutex-dec.h  | 2 +-
>  include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h | 6 +++++-
>  kernel/rcu/tree.c                | 1 -
>  7 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/mutex.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/mutex.h
> index f41e66d65e31..28cb819e0ff9 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/mutex.h
> +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/mutex.h
> @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ __mutex_fastpath_unlock(atomic_t *count, void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
>  static inline int
>  __mutex_fastpath_trylock(atomic_t *count, int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
>  {
> -	if (cmpxchg_acq(count, 1, 0) == 1)
> +	if (atomic_read(count) == 1 && cmpxchg_acq(count, 1, 0) == 1)
>  		return 1;
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mutex.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mutex.h
> index 127ab23e1f6c..078155fa1189 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mutex.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mutex.h
> @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ __mutex_fastpath_unlock(atomic_t *count, void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
>  static inline int
>  __mutex_fastpath_trylock(atomic_t *count, int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
>  {
> -	if (likely(__mutex_cmpxchg_lock(count, 1, 0) == 1))
> +	if (likely(atomic_read(count) == 1 && __mutex_cmpxchg_lock(count, 1, 0) == 1))
>  		return 1;
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mutex_32.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mutex_32.h
> index 85e6cda45a02..e9355a84fc67 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mutex_32.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mutex_32.h
> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static inline int __mutex_fastpath_trylock(atomic_t *count,
>  					   int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
>  {
>  	/* cmpxchg because it never induces a false contention state. */
> -	if (likely(atomic_cmpxchg(count, 1, 0) == 1))
> +	if (likely(atomic_read(count) == 1 && atomic_cmpxchg(count, 1, 0) == 1))
>  		return 1;
> 
>  	return 0;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mutex_64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mutex_64.h
> index 07537a44216e..d9850758464e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mutex_64.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mutex_64.h
> @@ -118,10 +118,10 @@ do {								\
>  static inline int __mutex_fastpath_trylock(atomic_t *count,
>  					   int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
>  {
> -	if (likely(atomic_cmpxchg(count, 1, 0) == 1))
> +	if (likely(atomic_read(count) == 1 && atomic_cmpxchg(count, 1, 0) == 1))
>  		return 1;
> -	else
> -		return 0;
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
> 
>  #endif /* _ASM_X86_MUTEX_64_H */
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/mutex-dec.h b/include/asm-generic/mutex-dec.h
> index fd694cfd678a..c54829d3de37 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/mutex-dec.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/mutex-dec.h
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ __mutex_fastpath_unlock(atomic_t *count, void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
>  static inline int
>  __mutex_fastpath_trylock(atomic_t *count, int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
>  {
> -	if (likely(atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(count, 1, 0) == 1))
> +	if (likely(atomic_read(count) == 1 && atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(count, 1, 0) == 1))
>  		return 1;
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h b/include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h
> index a6b4a7bd6ac9..3269ec4e195f 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h
> @@ -91,8 +91,12 @@ __mutex_fastpath_unlock(atomic_t *count, void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
>  static inline int
>  __mutex_fastpath_trylock(atomic_t *count, int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
>  {
> -	int prev = atomic_xchg_acquire(count, 0);
> +	int prev;
> 
> +	if (atomic_read(count) != 1)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	prev = atomic_xchg_acquire(count, 0);
>  	if (unlikely(prev < 0)) {
>  		/*
>  		 * The lock was marked contended so we must restore that
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index c7f1bc4f817c..b7326893221f 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -3681,7 +3681,6 @@ static bool exp_funnel_lock(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long s)
>  	if (ULONG_CMP_LT(READ_ONCE(rnp->exp_seq_rq), s) &&
>  	    (rnp == rnp_root ||
>  	     ULONG_CMP_LT(READ_ONCE(rnp_root->exp_seq_rq), s)) &&
> -	    !mutex_is_locked(&rsp->exp_mutex) &&
>  	    mutex_trylock(&rsp->exp_mutex))
>  		goto fastpath;
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-02 15:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-01 18:58 Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-02 13:27 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2016-06-02 14:26 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-06-08 14:26 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/mutex: " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160602132724.GG5231@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=Waiman.Long@hpe.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®