From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
roger.pau@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xen-blkfront: don't call talk_to_blkback when already connected to blkback
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 10:30:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160602143009.GB23598@char.us.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <574E7763.9060001@oracle.com>
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 01:49:23PM +0800, Bob Liu wrote:
>
> On 06/01/2016 04:33 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 04:59:16PM +0800, Bob Liu wrote:
> >> Sometimes blkfont may receive twice blkback_changed() notification after
> >> migration, then talk_to_blkback() will be called twice too and confused
> >> xen-blkback.
> >
> > Could you enlighten the patch description by having some form of
> > state transition here? I am curious how you got the frontend
> > to get in XenbusStateConnected (via blkif_recover right) and then
> > the backend triggering the update once more?
> >
> > Or is just a simple race - the backend moves from XenbusStateConnected->
> > XenbusStateConnected - which retriggers the frontend to hit in
> > blkback_changed the XenbusStateConnected state and go in there?
> > (That would be in conenct_ring changing the state). But I don't
> > see how the frontend_changed code get there as we have:
> >
> > 770 /*
> > 771 * Ensure we connect even when two watches fire in
> > 772 * close succession and we miss the intermediate value
> > 773 * of frontend_state.
> > 774 */
> > 775 if (dev->state == XenbusStateConnected)
> > 776 break;
> > 777
> >
> > ?
> >
> > Now what about 'blkfront_connect' being called on the second time?
> >
> > Ah, info->connected is probably by then in BLKIF_STATE_CONNECTED
> > (as blkif_recover changed) and we just reread the size of the disk.
> >
> > Is that how about the flow goes?
>
> blkfront blkback
> blkfront_resume()
> > talk_to_blkback()
> > Set blkfront to XenbusStateInitialised
> Front changed()
> > Connect()
> > Set blkback to XenbusStateConnected
>
> blkback_changed()
> > Skip talk_to_blkback()
> because frontstate == XenbusStateInitialised
> > blkfront_connect()
> > Set blkfront to XenbusStateConnected
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> But sometimes blkfront receives
> blkback_changed() event more than once!
Could the control stack (xend) be doing this?
> Not sure why.
>
> blkback_changed()
> > because now frontstate != XenbusStateInitialised
> talk_to_blkback() is also called again
> > blkfront state changed from
> XenbusStateConnected to XenbusStateInitialised
> (Which is not correct!)
>
>
> Front_changed():
> > Do nothing because blkback
> already in XenbusStateConnected
>
>
> Now blkback is XenbusStateConnected but blkfront still XenbusStateInitialised.
Ah!
>
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 3 ++-
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> >> index ca13df8..01aa460 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> >> @@ -2485,7 +2485,8 @@ static void blkback_changed(struct xenbus_device *dev,
> >> break;
> >>
> >> case XenbusStateConnected:
> >> - if (dev->state != XenbusStateInitialised) {
> >> + if ((dev->state != XenbusStateInitialised) &&
> >> + (dev->state != XenbusStateConnected)) {
> >> if (talk_to_blkback(dev, info))
> >> break;
> >> }
> >> --
> >> 2.7.4
> >>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-02 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-31 8:59 Bob Liu
2016-05-31 8:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] xen-blkfront: fix resume issues Bob Liu
2016-05-31 20:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] xen-blkfront: don't call talk_to_blkback when already connected to blkback Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-06-01 5:49 ` Bob Liu
2016-06-02 14:30 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2016-06-07 15:25 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-06-08 6:46 ` Bob Liu
2016-06-08 14:47 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-06-15 8:39 ` [Xen-devel] " Ross Lagerwall
2016-06-15 14:08 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160602143009.GB23598@char.us.oracle.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=bob.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®