From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753567AbcFBQ5N (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 2 Jun 2016 12:57:13 -0400
Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:35678 "EHLO
	mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753328AbcFBQ5L (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 2 Jun 2016 12:57:11 -0400
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 17:56:51 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com>,
        "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
        Eric Nelson <eric@nelint.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Message-ID: <20160602165651.GP2282@sirena.org.uk>
References: <20160602124724.7725-1-clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com>
 <CAOMZO5B20n7Tu3r+BsU2R5BbYj41tf7qBsMLRWxChdWMkHxLNQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZqRzwd/9tauJXEMK"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAOMZO5B20n7Tu3r+BsU2R5BbYj41tf7qBsMLRWxChdWMkHxLNQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Cookie: Your present plans will be successful.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 92.54.156.156
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: sgtl5000: only check VDDD-supply, not revision
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


--ZqRzwd/9tauJXEMK
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 12:48:15PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:

> Sometime ago you were looking at this. What do you think about this patch?

I'm rather concerned that the patches came from people working closely
with Freescale already - are we *sure* that Freescale/NXP's public
errata are accurate?

--ZqRzwd/9tauJXEMK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXUGVSAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQEzIH/i/xMLPGJc7W7mWZ/g2YIPC9
K+hKsg/rFZpMR6szIAnhDvPlw+B5UVYOxhr3kA0WHVsOJQwY668zMhA0M73J4hQL
r1q5RhW9aMqs9sc/qzdxgGkLqLpFudo28pj8+bDV62xi5ymi/8muPnaogFd/QHNR
CfV5wcOvFZrg1j4l06x5kD/1bWYEIhsXOpJFC0GmFMZH1Dv3whs6KbSHJ4qmWVZN
TDf6JyvvcVeWd4hI0KrSwMyITYA7aim7TcG7TcGNV5cQc1tnzZShujhxxj4gC1ST
bC9EkF2GWvK8rcq6RCyG+9JyU2EBMw78lu+Ak13ziwRirOE6TrDWizbd9wGDbsw=
=BgCI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ZqRzwd/9tauJXEMK--