From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752976AbcFCVEr (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 3 Jun 2016 17:04:47 -0400
Received: from tex.lwn.net ([70.33.254.29]:52390 "EHLO vena.lwn.net"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S932372AbcFCVEY (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 3 Jun 2016 17:04:24 -0400
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 15:04:16 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@darmarit.de>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
        Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>,
        Dan Allen <dan@opendevise.io>, Russel Winder <russel@winder.org.uk>,
        Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Documentation/Sphinx
Message-ID: <20160603150416.55a6c966@lwn.net>
In-Reply-To: <87k2ibfh0x.fsf@intel.com>
References: <cover.1463748027.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
	<877fec7gfm.fsf@intel.com>
	<CAKMK7uGSwf_jd2Nys=yArmA6voGmbyfTP4UAibswT4rU6yi75Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<36300F5F-C3F3-4A55-9257-788CF9F96CA4@darmarit.de>
	<878tyrbo36.fsf@intel.com>
	<5369C8B8-47F2-4B67-A314-5EB5471ABA00@darmarit.de>
	<87k2ibfh0x.fsf@intel.com>
Organization: LWN.net
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 30 May 2016 23:05:34 +0300
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> wrote:

> To be clear, the "sphinx-for-docs-next" branch of [1], [2] is what I
> propose to merge at this time. There's the Sphinx configuration, kernel
> build integration, Sphinx kernel-doc extension, tons of kernel-doc
> updates, etc. 

OK, I do believe that I am ready to do that.  Many, many thanks for doing
this work!  Please drop me a note when you think that the branch is ready
to go.

> There is no DocBook tmpl conversion; all of that is left
> to the authors (owners, maintainers) of the documents, but this enables
> them to focus on that part.

I would like to have some actual documents in there in the near future,
so that interested folks have something to look at and start with.  Maybe
I'll do that myself with some of the docbooks without active maintainers,
or even, maybe, some of the .txt files :)

Thanks,

jon