From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752340AbcFFSEv (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2016 14:04:51 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:45418 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751574AbcFFSEu (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2016 14:04:50 -0400 Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 19:04:11 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Stefan Agner Cc: lee.jones@linaro.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, khilman@baylibre.com, carlo@caione.org, b.galvani@gmail.com, max.oss.09@gmail.com, marcel@ziswiler.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, mark.rutland@arm.com, pawel.moll@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org Message-ID: <20160606180411.GG7510@sirena.org.uk> References: <20160605001749.4062-1-stefan@agner.ch> <20160605001749.4062-5-stefan@agner.ch> <20160606173539.GC7510@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="L1c6L/cjZjI9d0Eq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: We've upped our standards, so up yours! User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] regulator: rn5t618: add RN5T567 PMIC support X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --L1c6L/cjZjI9d0Eq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 10:47:40AM -0700, Stefan Agner wrote: > On 2016-06-06 10:35, Mark Brown wrote: > > Acked-by: Mark Brown > Thanks Mark. > Do you have an idea how the patchset should be handled with the > dependent dt change in patch 1? Lee will need to apply at least the first patch, I'd expect he'll also apply this and send me a pull request (or perhaps just send me a pull request for the MFD change). --L1c6L/cjZjI9d0Eq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXVbsaAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQmAgH/RAIEI/JmnRcxGbepe+AKfP/ teUemlt0FIBljw6qpGTpGP8gLdK/9ZRbMnMn/H5MQjCLhNgWuNDZEIA6oNklLcgp PvgFfWqWzLFe0wobFK6HI8nF6KwMYt7l52LzP/ZMh6Up3nv8nYCagXFY8TePqEVC hcIU8vFAvEJZR6IPvfqaouq1qsTF4cP2yOlfXFslF4bZEPvyVNGBK5/cegsEXBOb q+hED9//B8ojjfAZxc4S8xfvUPpBdp9CTqV3/a6GQBWzKYCCXlbxJDEQOky/k5Hf DsKGowWaFz5FTWJVnB+D3YCGoSZ1XWd7ZSr3npLM1c8GziccTvTS/jnrtl3COJA= =9smB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --L1c6L/cjZjI9d0Eq--