From: Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@redhat.com>
To: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] Write dump into container's filesystem for pipe_type core_pattern
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 21:09:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160607190941.d4hfqehvwxylon4l@mguzik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9d61a9a95ca4c323adc182abf32714b46e963405.1465293010.git.zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 07:29:37PM +0800, Zhao Lei wrote:
> In current system, when we set core_pattern to a pipe, both pipe program
> and program's output are in host's filesystem.
> But when we set core_pattern to a file, the container will write dump
> into container's filesystem.
>
> For example, when we set following core_pattern:
> # echo "|/my_dump_pipe %s %c %p %u %g %t e" >/proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern
> and trigger a segment fault in a container, my_dump_pipe is searched from
> host's filesystem, and it will write coredump into host's filesystem too.
>
> In a privileged container, user can destroy host system by following
> command:
> # # In a container
> # echo "|/bin/dd of=/boot/vmlinuz" >/proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern
> # make_dump
>
> Actually, all operation in a container should not change host's
> environment, the container should use core_pattern as its private setting.
> In detail, in core dump action:
> 1: Search pipe program in container's fs namespace.
> 2: Run pipe program in container's fs namespace to write coredump to it.
>
> This patch fixed above problem by running pipe program with container's
> fs_root.
>
This does not look sufficient, but I can't easily verify.
For instance, is the spawned process able to attach itself with ptrace
to processes outside of the original container? Even if not, can it
mount procfs and use /proc/pid/root of processes outside of said
container?
The spawned process should be subject to all limitations imposed on the
container (which may mean it just must be in the container).
--
Mateusz Guzik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-07 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-07 9:52 [PATCH v2 0/3] " Zhao Lei
2016-06-07 11:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] Save dump_root into pid_namespace Zhao Lei
2016-06-07 11:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] Make dump_pipe thread possilbe to select the rootfs Zhao Lei
2016-06-07 11:29 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] Write dump into container's filesystem for pipe_type core_pattern Zhao Lei
2016-06-07 19:09 ` Mateusz Guzik [this message]
2016-06-07 21:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160607190941.d4hfqehvwxylon4l@mguzik \
--to=mguzik@redhat.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®