From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423702AbcFHRdi (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2016 13:33:38 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:51034 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753155AbcFHRdg (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2016 13:33:36 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 18:33:23 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PM list , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Alan Stern , Grant Likely , Mark Brown , Rob Herring , Tomeu Vizoso , Thierry Reding , Dmitry Torokhov , Geert Uytterhoeven , Michael Turquette Message-ID: <20160608173323.GN7510@sirena.org.uk> References: <1623682.7KVblAB3KQ@vostro.rjw.lan> <2576341.476ZsjkPgF@vostro.rjw.lan> <20160608121517.GG7510@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2CW6+cughRlDaKZr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: We've upped our standards, so up yours! User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:348:6:8808:fab::3 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Functional dependencies between devices X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --2CW6+cughRlDaKZr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 07:24:15PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 02:52:11AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> What follows is my prototype implementation of this. It took some time > >> to develop (much more than I was hoping for), but here it goes at last. > > Might be worth posting this outside the thread with CCs to people > > working on system integration like SoC maintainers - I'd completely > > missed this as it was buried and looked like the middle of an old > > discussion. > OK > I can resend it afresh, but need to do some rework due to some changes > that happened in the meantime. Yeah, it looks like the actual patches didn't get much comment but there's the constant grumbling about deferred probe which it'd be good to resolve. --2CW6+cughRlDaKZr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXWFbiAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQ7BYH/j9q2v/m4k4WRx9xd/Rkt1di 9Joyx6tRZuW9Bj76Clsiov/iafgB46+oYnYsUTZYIf12aAqzErGrtrbHH05qzAzp QDkfHYQarPDgilZKllD/N8iz9kcRIa6APUCXnAOILRocMBadk3xxaS5MjkDiKwyb hDkxPcvkoXogTbJYF7HWQfecbQv6Bv1JJdK0eH2NdKkBzCP2He1MTPKCYzJJyMGv WrpfkoVELTdp2n8/za63ZymEYQEJ1VcGcA6urRd8fjy/Ptj0Tk4xLI5DaFQY0C6Z vEsx0R8fBEf8TLh7PVS+wJ8OYNMijQYP5DkzTruDrqvpq/jW/GXSDiYRA++b2ws= =2Nb7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2CW6+cughRlDaKZr--