From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757124AbcFHURp (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2016 16:17:45 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53486 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756463AbcFHURk (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2016 16:17:40 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 13:17:39 -0700 From: Jerry Snitselaar To: linux-ima-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: ima and tpm2.0 Message-ID: <20160608201739.ysmexnczfawygpfo@rhwork> Reply-To: Jerry Snitselaar Mail-Followup-To: linux-ima-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1-neo (2016-05-30) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.27]); Wed, 08 Jun 2016 20:17:39 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Should the ima Kconfig have a select line for tpm_crb similar to the tpm_tis and tpm_ibmvtpm bits?