From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751838AbcFKFr6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Jun 2016 01:47:58 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:35013 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751462AbcFKFr5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Jun 2016 01:47:57 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 22:47:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20160610.224755.1614979708956751311.davem@davemloft.net> To: naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, matt@ozlabs.org, kda@linux-powerpc.org, paulus@samba.org, ast@fb.com, daniel@iogearbox.net, ananth@in.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] eBPF JIT for PPC64 From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Fri, 10 Jun 2016 22:47:56 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "Naveen N. Rao" Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:02:17 +0530 > Please note that patch [2] is a pre-requisite for this patchset, and is > not yet upstream. ... > [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2188694 > [2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.ppc.embedded/96514 Because of #2 I don't think I can take this directly into the networking tree, right? Therefore, how would you like this to be merged?