From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751989AbcFJC6b (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2016 22:58:31 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f173.google.com ([209.85.192.173]:34981 "EHLO mail-pf0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750756AbcFJC6a (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2016 22:58:30 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 08:28:25 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PM list , Srinivas Pandruvada , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: governor: Drop gov_cancel_work() Message-ID: <20160610025825.GD17903@vireshk-i7> References: <31871585.32WEDJA5Kj@vostro.rjw.lan> <20160609032100.GB9356@vireshk-i7> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09-06-16, 14:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 09-06-16, 01:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki > >> > >> There's no reason for gov_cancel_work() to exist at all, as it only > >> has one caller and the only thing done by that caller is to invoke > >> gov_cancel_work(). > >> > >> Accordingly, drop gov_cancel_work() and move its contents to the > >> caller. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > >> --- > >> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 19 +++++++------------ > >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar > > Thanks! > > > I am wondering what happened to your other patches around the governor callbacks > > and why weren't they applied yet :) > > They are in linux-next now, aren't they? Yeah, they are in now. -- viresh