From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965164AbcFMIDn (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2016 04:03:43 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:39773 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964851AbcFMIDm (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2016 04:03:42 -0400 Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 10:03:39 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jens Axboe Cc: Keith Busch , Christoph Hellwig , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: general preparation for NVMe over Fabrics support Message-ID: <20160613080339.GB21597@lst.de> References: <1465248052-17811-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20160609163854.GF1696@localhost.localdomain> <20160612133318.GA16543@kernel.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160612133318.GA16543@kernel.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 07:33:18AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > Added 1-8, 9/10 throws a lot of rejects and it's pre-coffee here. What > is this against? This was against 4.7-rc2 I think. But you already merged 9 and 10 in slightly different versions, so we should be fine.