From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1422756AbcFMKl0 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 13 Jun 2016 06:41:26 -0400
Received: from ns.sciencehorizons.net ([71.41.210.147]:23259 "HELO
	ns.sciencehorizons.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with SMTP id S964971AbcFMKlZ (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 13 Jun 2016 06:41:25 -0400
Date: 13 Jun 2016 06:41:22 -0400
Message-ID: <20160613104122.30341.qmail@ns.sciencehorizons.net>
From: "George Spelvin" <linux@sciencehorizons.net>
To: tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [patch 11/20] hlist: Add hlist_is_last_node() helper
Cc: linux@sciencehorizons.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Shouldn't this function be called hlist_is_only_node()?

hlist_is_last_node would be simply !n->next, as "last" doesn't
imply the lack of others.

I understand how the name might make sense in the context of removing
entries from the list, but in other contexts, it's confusing.