From: Kenneth Westfield <kwestfie@codeaurora.org>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Patrick Lai <plai@codeaurora.org>,
kwestfie@codeaurora.org,
Banajit Goswami <bgoswami@codeaurora.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] sound: lpass-platform: Move dma channel allocation to pcmops
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 05:49:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160614124908.GA16521@kwestfie-linux.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1465893003-12477-2-git-send-email-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 09:30:03AM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> Move dma channel allocations to pcmops open and close functions. Reason
> to do this is that, lpass_platform_pcm_free() accesses snd_soc_pcm_runtime
> via substream->private data, However By this time runtimes are already
> freed as part of soc_cleanup_card_resources() sequence.
>
> This patch moves the channel allocations/deallocations to pcmops open()
> and close() respectively, where the code has valid snd_soc_pcm_runtime.
> ---
> sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c | 155 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c b/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c
> index db000c6..3bd2cd6 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c
> @@ -61,7 +61,36 @@ static int lpass_platform_pcmops_open(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
> + if (substream->stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) {
> + pcm_data->rdma_ch = ch;
> + reg = LPAIF_RDMACTL_REG(v, ch);
Spacing.
> + } else {
> + pcm_data->wrdma_ch = ch;
> + reg = LPAIF_WRDMACTL_REG(v, ch);
Spacing.
> +static int lpass_platform_pcmops_close(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
> +{
> + struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *soc_runtime = substream->private_data;
> + struct lpass_pcm_data *pcm_data = snd_soc_pcm_get_drvdata(soc_runtime);
> + struct lpass_data *drvdata =
> + snd_soc_platform_get_drvdata(soc_runtime->platform);
> + struct lpass_variant *v = drvdata->variant;
> + int ch;
> +
> + if (v->free_dma_channel) {
> + if (substream->stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK)
> + ch = pcm_data->rdma_ch;
> + else
> + ch = pcm_data->wrdma_ch;
> +
> + if (ch >= 0)
> + v->free_dma_channel(drvdata, ch);
> + }
Since this is being moved from free() to close(), drvdata->substream[ch]
should be set to NULL. Otherwise, the array could fill up as the PCM is
opened/closed.
> @@ -471,14 +529,12 @@ static int lpass_platform_pcm_new(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *soc_runtime)
> struct snd_pcm *pcm = soc_runtime->pcm;
> struct snd_pcm_substream *psubstream, *csubstream;
> struct snd_soc_dai *cpu_dai = soc_runtime->cpu_dai;
> - struct lpass_data *drvdata =
> - snd_soc_platform_get_drvdata(soc_runtime->platform);
> - struct lpass_variant *v = drvdata->variant;
> - int ret = -EINVAL;
> + struct device *dev = soc_runtime->platform->dev;
> struct lpass_pcm_data *data;
> size_t size = lpass_platform_pcm_hardware.buffer_bytes_max;
> + int ret = -EINVAL;
>
> - data = devm_kzalloc(soc_runtime->dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
> + data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
Is the reason for changing the dev pointer similar to why it was changed
for snd_dma_alloc_pages() below?
> + ret = snd_dma_alloc_pages(SNDRV_DMA_TYPE_DEV, dev, size,
> + &psubstream->dma_buffer);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(soc_runtime->dev,
> - "%s() error writing to rdmactl reg: %d\n",
> - __func__, ret);
> - goto capture_alloc_err;
> + dev_err(dev, "can't alloc playback dma buffer\n");
Print the return value.
> + ret = snd_dma_alloc_pages(SNDRV_DMA_TYPE_DEV, dev, size,
> + &csubstream->dma_buffer);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(soc_runtime->dev,
> - "%s() error writing to wrdmactl reg: %d\n",
> - __func__, ret);
> - goto capture_reg_err;
> + dev_err(dev, "can't alloc capture dma buffer\n");
Ditto.
--
Kenneth Westfield
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-14 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-14 8:30 [PATCH v2 1/2] sound: lpass-cpu: add module licence and description Srinivas Kandagatla
2016-06-14 8:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] sound: lpass-platform: Move dma channel allocation to pcmops Srinivas Kandagatla
2016-06-14 12:49 ` Kenneth Westfield [this message]
2016-06-14 13:34 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2016-06-14 16:33 ` [alsa-devel] " Kenneth Westfield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160614124908.GA16521@kwestfie-linux.qualcomm.com \
--to=kwestfie@codeaurora.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=bgoswami@codeaurora.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=plai@codeaurora.org \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®