From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932953AbcFOPJO (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jun 2016 11:09:14 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59779 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753435AbcFOPJI (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jun 2016 11:09:08 -0400 Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:09:03 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Michal Hocko Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Tetsuo Handa , David Rientjes , Vladimir Davydov , Andrew Morton , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10 -v4] Handle oom bypass more gracefully Message-ID: <20160615150903.GE7944@redhat.com> References: <1465473137-22531-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1465473137-22531-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Wed, 15 Jun 2016 15:09:08 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/09, Michal Hocko wrote: > > this is the v4 version of the patchse. I would like to ack this series even if I do not pretend I understand all implications. But imo every change makes sense and this version adresses my previous comments, so FWIW: Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov