From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752992AbcFOPx7 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 15 Jun 2016 11:53:59 -0400
Received: from mail-qk0-f195.google.com ([209.85.220.195]:33087 "EHLO
	mail-qk0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751400AbcFOPx4 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 15 Jun 2016 11:53:56 -0400
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 11:53:50 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Abdul Haleem <abdhalee@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Move wq_update_unbound_numa() to the
 beginning of CPU_ONLINE
Message-ID: <20160615155350.GB24102@mtj.duckdns.org>
References: <cover.1465311052.git.ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <6b3c7059ec5d2d6157d23d619e4507692a42a5bd.1465311052.git.ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6b3c7059ec5d2d6157d23d619e4507692a42a5bd.1465311052.git.ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hello,

On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 08:44:02PM +0530, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
> Currently in the CPU_ONLINE workqueue handler, the
> restore_unbound_workers_cpumask() will never call
> set_cpus_allowed_ptr() for a newly created unbound worker thread.

Hmmm... did you actually verify that this happens?  A new kworker
always gets bound to the cpumask that it's assigned to in
create_worker().

Thanks.

-- 
tejun