From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753747AbcFOUdK (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:33:10 -0400
Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:36102 "EHLO
	mail-wm0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750751AbcFOUdH (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:33:07 -0400
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 22:39:52 +0200
From: Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com" 
	<kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
        PaX Team <pageexec@freemail.hu>,
        Brad Spengler <spender@grsecurity.net>, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
        linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        bart.vanassche@sandisk.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Introduce the latent_entropy gcc plugin
Message-Id: <20160615223952.f3a4ece452b15c62babf4629@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jK-QVhbuOnNENq9PesPTdPCnbgODzb0qn=q4ZMS0-ndBA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20160615001754.f9e986cf961d1466f5e086dc@gmail.com>
	<CAGXu5jK-QVhbuOnNENq9PesPTdPCnbgODzb0qn=q4ZMS0-ndBA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 11:55:44 -0700
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:

>  The limit on the length of lines is 80 columns and this is a strongly
>  preferred limit.

I think the code looks worse when it is truncated to 80 columns but
I'll do it and resend the patches.

-- 
Emese