From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] x86: Pass kernel thread parameters in fork_frame
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 15:51:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160620135158.GE22065@nazgul.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466283378-17062-6-git-send-email-brgerst@gmail.com>
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 04:56:17PM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote:
> Instead of setting up a fake pt_regs context, put the kernel thread
> function pointer and arg into the unused callee-restored registers
> of struct fork_frame.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S | 31 +++++++++++++++----------------
> arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 35 ++++++++++++++++-------------------
> arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 14 ++++----------
> arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 10 +++-------
> 4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
...
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> index 7574528..23e764c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> @@ -404,37 +404,34 @@ END(__switch_to_asm)
> * A newly forked process directly context switches into this address.
> *
> * rax: prev task we switched from
> + * rbx: kernel thread func
> + * r12: kernel thread arg
> */
> ENTRY(ret_from_fork)
> movq %rax, %rdi
> call schedule_tail /* rdi: 'prev' task parameter */
>
> - testb $3, CS(%rsp) /* from kernel_thread? */
> + testq %rbx, %rbx /* from kernel_thread? */
> jnz 1f
>
> - /*
> - * We came from kernel_thread. This code path is quite twisted, and
> - * someone should clean it up.
> - *
> - * copy_thread_tls stashes the function pointer in RBX and the
> - * parameter to be passed in RBP. The called function is permitted
> - * to call do_execve and thereby jump to user mode.
> - */
> - movq RBP(%rsp), %rdi
> - call *RBX(%rsp)
> - movl $0, RAX(%rsp)
> -
> - /*
> - * Fall through as though we're exiting a syscall. This makes a
> - * twisted sort of sense if we just called do_execve.
> - */
> -
> -1:
> +2:
> movq %rsp, %rdi
> call syscall_return_slowpath /* returns with IRQs disabled */
> TRACE_IRQS_ON /* user mode is traced as IRQS on */
> SWAPGS
> jmp restore_regs_and_iret
> +
> +1:
> + /* kernel thread */
> + movq %r12, %rdi
> + call *%rbx
> + /*
> + * A kernel thread is allowed to return here after successfully
> + * calling do_execve(). Exit to userspace to complete the execve()
> + * syscall.
> + */
> + movq $0, RAX(%rsp)
> + jmp 2b
> END(ret_from_fork)
Wouldn't it be simpler to reverse the JNZ after the TESTB above and thus
have a single label and simpler code flow (pasting the whole thing here
because a diff is unreadable):
ENTRY(ret_from_fork)
movq %rax, %rdi
call schedule_tail /* rdi: 'prev' task parameter */
testq %rbx, %rbx /* from kernel_thread? */
jz 1f
/* kernel thread */
movq %r12, %rdi
call *%rbx
/*
* A kernel thread is allowed to return here after successfully
* calling do_execve(). Exit to userspace to complete the execve()
* syscall.
*/
movq $0, RAX(%rsp)
1:
movq %rsp, %rdi
call syscall_return_slowpath /* returns with IRQs disabled */
TRACE_IRQS_ON /* user mode is traced as IRQS on */
SWAPGS
jmp restore_regs_and_iret
END(ret_from_fork)
It boots fine in my guest this way too.
Ditto for 32-bit.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-20 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-18 20:56 [PATCH v2 0/6] x86: Rewrite switch_to() Brian Gerst
2016-06-18 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] x86-32, kgdb: Don't use thread.ip in sleeping_thread_to_gdb_regs() Brian Gerst
2016-06-18 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] x86-64, kgdb: clear GDB_PS on 64-bit Brian Gerst
2016-06-18 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] x86: Add struct inactive_task_frame Brian Gerst
2016-06-19 21:18 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-20 15:39 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-06-18 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] x86: Rewrite switch_to() code Brian Gerst
2016-06-19 21:22 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-20 15:44 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-06-18 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] x86: Pass kernel thread parameters in fork_frame Brian Gerst
2016-06-19 21:28 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-19 22:01 ` Brian Gerst
2016-06-20 13:51 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2016-06-20 15:01 ` Brian Gerst
2016-06-20 15:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-06-22 4:24 ` Brian Gerst
2016-07-09 12:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-06-18 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] x86: Fix thread_saved_pc() Brian Gerst
2016-06-20 16:01 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-06-22 4:27 ` Brian Gerst
2016-06-24 18:12 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-06-19 22:05 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] x86: Rewrite switch_to() Brian Gerst
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160620135158.GE22065@nazgul.tnic \
--to=bp@suse.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®