mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	gnurou@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] regulator: core: Allow simultaneous use of enable op and GPIO
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 11:34:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160622103432.GJ28202@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160622082558.20935-2-acourbot@nvidia.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 951 bytes --]

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 05:25:53PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> The current regulator enable/disable mechanism does not call the driver
> enable/disable op if an enable GPIO is set. It may be desirable to use
> both mechanisms though, e.g. in the case of a PWM regulator that also
> has an enable GPIO.
> 
> _regulator_is_enabled() is also updated in order to take both enable
> conditions into account.

This is going to break or at least reduce the performance of a lot of
users - it is very common for regulators to have configurable support
for a GPIO enable in addition to a register enable with the GPIO enable
replacing a register enable for improved performance.  If you have some
strange device that requires GPIO and other operations the driver should
handle that, if nothing else it's likely that there are sequencing
requirements between the two which we are probably not going to get
right for everyone in the core.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-22 10:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-22  8:25 [PATCH 0/6] regulator: add enable GPIO property to pwm-regulator Alexandre Courbot
2016-06-22  8:25 ` [PATCH 1/6] regulator: core: Allow simultaneous use of enable op and GPIO Alexandre Courbot
2016-06-22 10:34   ` Mark Brown [this message]
2016-06-23  1:10     ` Alexandre Courbot
2016-06-23  5:29       ` Alexandre Courbot
2016-06-23 10:01         ` Mark Brown
2016-06-22  8:25 ` [PATCH 2/6] regulator: of: Add enable GPIO configuration function Alexandre Courbot
2016-06-22 10:35   ` Mark Brown
2016-06-22  8:25 ` [PATCH 3/6] regulator: fixed: Use of_get_regulator_gpio_config Alexandre Courbot
2016-06-22  8:25 ` [PATCH 4/6] regulator: gpio: " Alexandre Courbot
2016-06-22  8:25 ` [PATCH 5/6] pwm-regulator: Support for enable GPIO Alexandre Courbot
2016-06-22  8:25 ` [PATCH 6/6] dt-bindings: pwm-regulator: Document enable-gpio property Alexandre Courbot
2016-06-22 10:36   ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160622103432.GJ28202@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®