From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752062AbcFZM5q (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jun 2016 08:57:46 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:43536 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751789AbcFZM5o (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jun 2016 08:57:44 -0400 Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 13:57:17 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Michal Suchanek Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Kees Cook , Thomas Gleixner , Dan Williams , Tejun Heo , "Paul E. McKenney" , Davidlohr Bueso , Andrey Ryabinin , Nikolay Aleksandrov , Dmitry Vyukov , Adrien Schildknecht , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-spi Message-ID: <20160626125717.GQ28202@sirena.org.uk> References: <20160626011500.GF28202@sirena.org.uk> <20160626112133.GJ28202@sirena.org.uk> <20160626115815.GN28202@sirena.org.uk> <20160626124550.GO28202@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rvv34iIeJXisuDc0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Beware of Bigfoot! User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:348:6:8808:fab::3 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] spi: of: allow instantiating slaves without a driver X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --rvv34iIeJXisuDc0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 02:53:31PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: > On 26 June 2016 at 14:45, Mark Brown wrote: > > No, there's other things like figuring out which controller to bind to > > that need to be taken into consideration. > Why do you care? So long as you name the CS that is available on > connector with the same pinout same on all boards you can target the > slave regardless of the controller it's attached to. That would be a binding for the connector which is the big missing bit here - it's not clear that such a limited connector description would be a good idea. --rvv34iIeJXisuDc0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXb9EsAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQ0QwH/3qR/SBOPgBpq+jUV+mv24wy 9WUnaoTeZJvfVhD+N3qmC8QLtDzSvwLpo2+8GT6E3aF+nm+2C7SHD+/S6Wub2nKu WFjj0r4T9FnrTgcjNqV8D0lAKAfy8jJZ3w7bNpRjxiPOetIAb2KYPuUGqELap9o0 uhfVUwo41ZZKWAhI89sv7SsPyg358v25DgAUq5xb3U+6nActJLSZf8KFVhXABrpB IUYO5V3dehVYZAL3LLfV090mdoD4bOfkVyuUAohSfIhcwsGzT4+L0jnvP+PjzV0c 7xOuzstzJ3uLzLXODVQlpuPG9NM0uP1EsdgpTpa9Qki/yU82eJ+wItybO2NuQzo= =ddCQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rvv34iIeJXisuDc0--