From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932373AbcGDJm4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jul 2016 05:42:56 -0400 Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238]:36886 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751562AbcGDJmy (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jul 2016 05:42:54 -0400 Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 11:35:58 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: Richard Weinberger Cc: computersforpeace@gmail.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtdpart: propagate _get/put_device() Message-ID: <20160704113558.0daab438@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: <1467231263-3974-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> References: <1467231263-3974-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> Organization: Free Electrons X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 22:14:23 +0200 Richard Weinberger wrote: > If the master device has callbacks for _get/put_device() > and this MTD has slaves a get_mtd_device() call on paritions > will never issue the registered callbacks. > Fix this by propergating _get/put_device() down. > > Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger Nit below, otherwise it looks good to me: Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon > --- > Hi! > > I've found this issue while heavily reworking nandsim. > With my changes applied you can add/remove MTD's during > runtime. I figured that nandsim's refcounting goes nuts. > After tracking down the root cause I figured that > _get/put_device() has no effect on MTD slaves. > > Thanks, > //richard > > --- > drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c > index 1f13e32..938dbeb 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c > @@ -317,6 +317,19 @@ static int part_block_markbad(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs) > return res; > } > > +static int part_get_device(struct mtd_info *mtd) > +{ > + struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd); > + return part->master->_get_device(part->master); > +} > + > +static void part_put_device(struct mtd_info *mtd) > +{ > + struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd); > + part->master->_put_device(part->master); > +} > + > + Extra blank line here. > static int part_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section, > struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion) > { > @@ -463,6 +476,12 @@ static struct mtd_part *allocate_partition(struct mtd_info *master, > slave->mtd._block_isbad = part_block_isbad; > if (master->_block_markbad) > slave->mtd._block_markbad = part_block_markbad; > + > + if (master->_get_device) > + slave->mtd._get_device = part_get_device; > + if (master->_put_device) > + slave->mtd._put_device = part_put_device; > + > slave->mtd._erase = part_erase; > slave->master = master; > slave->offset = part->offset;