From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Irina Tirdea <irina.tirdea@intel.com>,
Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/8] acpi: fix enumeration (visited) flags for bus rescans
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 12:00:13 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160707090013.GK23527@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31239967.dEXrvihxAE@vostro.rjw.lan>
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 11:09:44PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 06, 2016 06:37:46 PM Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Mika Westerberg
> > <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 11:19:06PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > >> If the ACPI tables changes as a result of a dinamically loaded table and
> > >> a bus rescan is required the enumeration/visited flag are not
> > >> consistent.
> > >>
> > >> I2C/SPI are not directly enumerated in acpi_bus_attach(), however the
> > >> visited flag is set. This makes it impossible to check if an ACPI device
> > >> has already been enumerated by the I2C and SPI subsystems. To fix this
> > >> issue we only set the visited flags if the device is not I2C or SPI.
> > >>
> > >> With this change we also need to remove setting visited to false from
> > >> acpi_bus_attach(), otherwise if we rescan already enumerated I2C/SPI
> > >> devices we try to re-enumerate them.
> > >>
> > >> Note that I2C/SPI devices can be enumerated either via a scan handler
> > >> (when using PRP0001) or via regular device_attach(). In either case
> > >> the flow goes through acpi_default_enumeration() which makes it the
> > >> ideal place to mark the ACPI device as enumerated.
> > >
> > > Hmm, this somehow fails to enumerate PRP0001 devices.
> > >
> > > I'm adding following SSDT to my initrd and the resulting device is never
> > > enumerated on SPI bus (it exists in /sys/bus/acpi/devices). If I use
> > > normal ACPI IDs (non-PRP0001) then it works fine.
> > >
> >
> > I specifically tested with PRP0001 via initrd with I2C, I am not sure
> > why it does not work on SPI. I'll give it a try tomorrow when I have
> > access to my setup.
>
> OK, I'll wait for this test to conclude before applying the series, then. :-)
I tested again and it works fine. I probably had an older version of the
series applied or something like that. Now, I'm able to see my AT25 SPI
eeprom successfully probed:
[ 7.264705] at25 spi-PRP0001:00: 1 KByte at25 eeprom, pagesize 32
Sorry about the confusion.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-07 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-01 20:19 [PATCH v5 0/8] ACPI overlays Octavian Purdila
2016-07-01 20:19 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] Documentation: acpi: add SSDT overlays documentation Octavian Purdila
2016-07-07 9:25 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-07-01 20:19 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] acpi: fix enumeration (visited) flags for bus rescans Octavian Purdila
2016-07-06 15:03 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-07-06 15:37 ` Octavian Purdila
2016-07-06 21:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-07-07 9:00 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2016-07-07 9:28 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-07-01 20:19 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] acpi: add support for ACPI reconfiguration notifiers Octavian Purdila
2016-07-07 9:34 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-07-01 20:19 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] i2c: add support for ACPI reconfigure notifications Octavian Purdila
2016-07-04 0:34 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-07-01 20:19 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] spi: " Octavian Purdila
2016-07-03 12:10 ` Mark Brown
2016-07-01 20:19 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] efi: load SSTDs from EFI variables Octavian Purdila
2016-07-02 8:18 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-07-04 12:00 ` Matt Fleming
2016-07-01 20:19 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] acpi: add support for configfs Octavian Purdila
2016-07-07 9:39 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-07-01 20:19 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] acpi: add support for loading SSDTs via configfs Octavian Purdila
2016-07-07 9:42 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-07-06 0:34 ` [PATCH v5 0/8] ACPI overlays Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-07-06 6:29 ` Octavian Purdila
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160707090013.GK23527@lahna.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=irina.tirdea@intel.com \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=leonard.crestez@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=octavian.purdila@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome