From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757377AbcGJWiG (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sun, 10 Jul 2016 18:38:06 -0400
Received: from tex.lwn.net ([70.33.254.29]:32804 "EHLO vena.lwn.net"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1757207AbcGJWiB (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 10 Jul 2016 18:38:01 -0400
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 16:37:55 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To: "baolex.ni" <baolex.ni@intel.com>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Update the maximum depth of C-state from 6 to 9
Message-ID: <20160710163755.769fea16@lwn.net>
In-Reply-To: <0b411f05-955f-ace7-cbe3-141f92952a09@intel.com>
References: <0b411f05-955f-ace7-cbe3-141f92952a09@intel.com>
Organization: LWN.net
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 09:55:10 +0800
"baolex.ni" <baolex.ni@intel.com> wrote:

> Currently, CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX has been defined as 10 in the cpuidle head file,
> and max_cstate = CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX – 1, so 9 is the right maximum depth of C-state.
> This change is reflected in one place of the kernel-param file,
> but not in the other place where I suggest changing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>

So why are there two signoffs on a single-line patch?  Which one of you
is the actual author?

Thanks,

jon