From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751779AbcGMLC7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2016 07:02:59 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:33104 "EHLO mail-wm0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751191AbcGMLCw (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2016 07:02:52 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:02:41 +0200 From: Daniel Vetter To: Chris Wilson , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sumit Semwal , Shuah Khan , Tejun Heo , Daniel Vetter , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Kees Cook , Thomas Gleixner , "Paul E. McKenney" , Dan Williams , Andrey Ryabinin , Davidlohr Bueso , Nikolay Aleksandrov , "David S. Miller" , Rasmus Villemoes , Andy Shevchenko , Dmitry Vyukov , Alexander Potapenko , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] async: Introduce kfence, a N:M completion mechanism Message-ID: <20160713110241.GE23520@phenom.ffwll.local> Mail-Followup-To: Chris Wilson , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sumit Semwal , Shuah Khan , Tejun Heo , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Kees Cook , Thomas Gleixner , "Paul E. McKenney" , Dan Williams , Andrey Ryabinin , Davidlohr Bueso , Nikolay Aleksandrov , "David S. Miller" , Rasmus Villemoes , Andy Shevchenko , Dmitry Vyukov , Alexander Potapenko , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org References: <1466759333-4703-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> <1466759333-4703-3-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> <20160713093852.GZ30921@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20160713102014.GC6157@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160713102014.GC6157@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com> X-Operating-System: Linux phenom 4.6.0-rc5+ User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:20:14AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:38:52AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Also, I'm not a particular fan of the k* naming, but I see 'fence' is > > already taken. > > Agreed, I really want to rename the dma-buf fence to struct dma_fence - > we would need to do that whilst it dma-buf fencing is still in its infancy. +1 on dma_fence, seems to make more sense than plain struct fence. Probably best to do after the recent pile of work from Gustavo to de-stage sync_file has landed. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch