From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751322AbcGMVN4 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:13:56 -0400
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:40823 "EHLO
	mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750765AbcGMVNt (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:13:49 -0400
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 14:13:43 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/34] mm: rename NR_ANON_PAGES to NR_ANON_MAPPED
Message-Id: <20160713141343.244c108e48086055f57b1d79@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160713133701.GK9806@techsingularity.net>
References: <1467970510-21195-1-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net>
	<1467970510-21195-19-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net>
	<20160712145801.GJ5881@cmpxchg.org>
	<20160713085516.GI9806@techsingularity.net>
	<20160713130415.GB9905@cmpxchg.org>
	<20160713133701.GK9806@techsingularity.net>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 14:37:01 +0100 Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> wrote:

> > I don't care strongly enough to cause a respin of half the series, and
> > it's not your problem that I waited until the last revision went into
> > mmots to review and comment. But if you agreed to a revert, would you
> > consider tacking on a revert patch at the end of the series?
> > 
> 
> In this case, I'm going to ask the other people on the cc for a
> tie-breaker. If someone else prefers the old names then I'm happy for
> your patch to be applied on top with my ack instead of respinning the
> whole series.
> 
> Anyone for a tie breaker?

I am aggressively undecided.  I guess as it's a bit of a 51/49
situation, the "stay with what people are familiar with" benefit tips the
balance toward the legacy names?