From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751518AbcGOP3x (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 15 Jul 2016 11:29:53 -0400
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:34796 "EHLO
	bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751032AbcGOP3u (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 15 Jul 2016 11:29:50 -0400
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 17:29:37 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree
Message-ID: <20160715152937.GB3115@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20160715170654.0b09a8bc@canb.auug.org.au>
 <20160715072243.GP30154@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20160715073119.GR30927@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20160715150903.GA2523@redhat.com>
 <20160715152436.GB2523@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160715152436.GB2523@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:24:36PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Seems ok, but I'll reinstate this:
> 
> #if BITS_PER_LONG != __BITS_PER_LONG
> #error Inconsistent word size. Check asm/bitsperlong.h
> #endif

Confuses me; why do we have two?

Why not then do:

#define BITS_PER_LONG __BITS_PER_LONG

and be done with it?