From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751764AbcGOPh0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jul 2016 11:37:26 -0400 Received: from outbound1.eu.mailhop.org ([52.28.251.132]:51237 "EHLO outbound1.eu.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751000AbcGOPhX (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jul 2016 11:37:23 -0400 X-MHO-User: 0a57630d-4aa2-11e6-ac92-3142cfe117f2 X-Report-Abuse-To: https://support.duocircle.com/support/solutions/articles/5000540958-duocircle-standard-smtp-abuse-information X-Originating-IP: 74.99.65.212 X-Mail-Handler: DuoCircle Outbound SMTP X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.6.8 io 3285880046 Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:37:16 +0000 From: Jason Cooper To: Hugo Miguel Silva Ferreira Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, joe@perches.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: skein: cleanup: Remove multiple blank lines Message-ID: <20160715153716.GE31509@io.lakedaemon.net> References: <20160715005440.GA6314@miho-VirtualBox> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160715005440.GA6314@miho-VirtualBox> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Hugo, On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 01:54:40AM +0100, Hugo Miguel Silva Ferreira wrote: > This patch fixes several warnings detected by the checkpatch.pl script. > > Signed-off-by: Hugo Miguel Silva Ferreira > --- > drivers/staging/skein/threefish_block.c | 16 ---------------- > 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-) Sorry, but that's a Nack from me. > diff --git a/drivers/staging/skein/threefish_block.c b/drivers/staging/skein/threefish_block.c > index a95563f..5064065 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/skein/threefish_block.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/skein/threefish_block.c > @@ -64,7 +64,6 @@ void threefish_encrypt_256(struct threefish_key *key_ctx, u64 *input, > b2 += b1; > b1 = rol64(b1, 32) ^ b2; > > - If you look at the source code now versus the source code I started with from Werner Dittman, you'll see that the extra blank line conveys information about grouping of operations. The proper 'fix' here is to use a comment at the beginning of each grouping, instead of the extra blank line. thx, Jason. > b1 += k3 + t2; > b0 += b1 + k2; > b1 = rol64(b1, 14) ^ b0; > @@ -117,7 +116,6 @@ void threefish_encrypt_256(struct threefish_key *key_ctx, u64 *input, > b2 += b1; > b1 = rol64(b1, 32) ^ b2; > > - > b1 += k0 + t1; > b0 += b1 + k4; > b1 = rol64(b1, 14) ^ b0; > @@ -170,7 +168,6 @@ void threefish_encrypt_256(struct threefish_key *key_ctx, u64 *input, > b2 += b1; > b1 = rol64(b1, 32) ^ b2; > > - > b1 += k2 + t0; > b0 += b1 + k1; > b1 = rol64(b1, 14) ^ b0; > @@ -223,7 +220,6 @@ void threefish_encrypt_256(struct threefish_key *key_ctx, u64 *input, > b2 += b1; > b1 = rol64(b1, 32) ^ b2; > > - > b1 += k4 + t2; > b0 += b1 + k3; > b1 = rol64(b1, 14) ^ b0; > @@ -276,7 +272,6 @@ void threefish_encrypt_256(struct threefish_key *key_ctx, u64 *input, > b2 += b1; > b1 = rol64(b1, 32) ^ b2; > > - > b1 += k1 + t1; > b0 += b1 + k0; > b1 = rol64(b1, 14) ^ b0; > @@ -329,7 +324,6 @@ void threefish_encrypt_256(struct threefish_key *key_ctx, u64 *input, > b2 += b1; > b1 = rol64(b1, 32) ^ b2; > > - > b1 += k3 + t0; > b0 += b1 + k2; > b1 = rol64(b1, 14) ^ b0; > @@ -382,7 +376,6 @@ void threefish_encrypt_256(struct threefish_key *key_ctx, u64 *input, > b2 += b1; > b1 = rol64(b1, 32) ^ b2; > > - > b1 += k0 + t2; > b0 += b1 + k4; > b1 = rol64(b1, 14) ^ b0; > @@ -435,7 +428,6 @@ void threefish_encrypt_256(struct threefish_key *key_ctx, u64 *input, > b2 += b1; > b1 = rol64(b1, 32) ^ b2; > > - > b1 += k2 + t1; > b0 += b1 + k1; > b1 = rol64(b1, 14) ^ b0; > @@ -579,7 +571,6 @@ void threefish_decrypt_256(struct threefish_key *key_ctx, u64 *input, > b2 -= b3 + k3 + t2; > b3 -= k4 + 16; > > - > tmp = b3 ^ b0; > b3 = ror64(tmp, 32); > b0 -= b3; > @@ -648,7 +639,6 @@ void threefish_decrypt_256(struct threefish_key *key_ctx, u64 *input, > b2 -= b3 + k1 + t0; > b3 -= k2 + 14; > > - > tmp = b3 ^ b0; > b3 = ror64(tmp, 32); > b0 -= b3; > @@ -717,7 +707,6 @@ void threefish_decrypt_256(struct threefish_key *key_ctx, u64 *input, > b2 -= b3 + k4 + t1; > b3 -= k0 + 12; > > - > tmp = b3 ^ b0; > b3 = ror64(tmp, 32); > b0 -= b3; > @@ -786,7 +775,6 @@ void threefish_decrypt_256(struct threefish_key *key_ctx, u64 *input, > b2 -= b3 + k2 + t2; > b3 -= k3 + 10; > > - > tmp = b3 ^ b0; > b3 = ror64(tmp, 32); > b0 -= b3; > @@ -855,7 +843,6 @@ void threefish_decrypt_256(struct threefish_key *key_ctx, u64 *input, > b2 -= b3 + k0 + t0; > b3 -= k1 + 8; > > - > tmp = b3 ^ b0; > b3 = ror64(tmp, 32); > b0 -= b3; > @@ -924,7 +911,6 @@ void threefish_decrypt_256(struct threefish_key *key_ctx, u64 *input, > b2 -= b3 + k3 + t1; > b3 -= k4 + 6; > > - > tmp = b3 ^ b0; > b3 = ror64(tmp, 32); > b0 -= b3; > @@ -993,7 +979,6 @@ void threefish_decrypt_256(struct threefish_key *key_ctx, u64 *input, > b2 -= b3 + k1 + t2; > b3 -= k2 + 4; > > - > tmp = b3 ^ b0; > b3 = ror64(tmp, 32); > b0 -= b3; > @@ -1062,7 +1047,6 @@ void threefish_decrypt_256(struct threefish_key *key_ctx, u64 *input, > b2 -= b3 + k4 + t0; > b3 -= k0 + 2; > > - > tmp = b3 ^ b0; > b3 = ror64(tmp, 32); > b0 -= b3; > -- > 2.7.4 >