From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752265AbcGSFDs (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jul 2016 01:03:48 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:53368 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751280AbcGSFDq (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jul 2016 01:03:46 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 22:03:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20160718.220342.805963245855552246.davem@davemloft.net> To: kan.liang@intel.com Cc: hannes@stressinduktion.org, andi@firstfloor.org, fw@strlen.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, jmorris@namei.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kaber@trash.net, akpm@linux-foundation.org, keescook@chromium.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, gorcunov@openvz.org, john.stultz@linaro.org, aduyck@mirantis.com, ben@decadent.org.uk, decot@googlers.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/30] Kernel NET policy From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F07712C19A4A@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <20160718194357.GL5871@two.firstfloor.org> <1468878674.1778899.669950273.69750E32@webmail.messagingengine.com> <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F07712C19A4A@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Mon, 18 Jul 2016 22:03:45 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "Liang, Kan" Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 01:49:41 +0000 > Yes, rtnl will bring some overheads. But the configuration is one > time thing for application or socket. It only happens on receiving > first packet. Thanks for destroying our connection rates. This kind of overhead is simply unacceptable.