From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753319AbcGSJXX (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jul 2016 05:23:23 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:34566 "EHLO mail-wm0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752524AbcGSJXS (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jul 2016 05:23:18 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 11:23:15 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Sebastian Gottschall Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , lukasz.odzioba@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Sasha Levin Subject: Re: Is: Revert c5ad33184354260be6d05de57e46a5498692f6d6 "mm/swap.c: flush lru pvecs on compound page arrival" from stable tree? Was:[osstest-admin@xenproject.org: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd] Message-ID: <20160719092314.GD9486@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20160718153046.GA26126@char.us.oracle.com> <20160719083216.GA9490@dhcp22.suse.cz> <3eccf077-612f-7422-4df2-3fed0f22bcaf@dd-wrt.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3eccf077-612f-7422-4df2-3fed0f22bcaf@dd-wrt.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue 19-07-16 10:35:09, Sebastian Gottschall wrote: > No such Message-ID known. Ups, sorry about that. I didn't know that the stable tree is not archived via lkml.kernel.org. Here is the link http://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg138760.html > Am 19.07.2016 um 10:32 schrieb Michal Hocko: > > [CCing Sasha] > > > > On Mon 18-07-16 11:30:46, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > Hey Lukasz, > > > > > > We found that your patch in the automated Xen test-case ends up > > > OOMing the box when trying to install guests. This worked prior > > > to your patch. > > > > > > See serial log: > > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/97597/test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd/serial-pinot0.log > > > > > > Would it be OK to revert this patch from the stable trees? > > The fix up is trivial so I believe it would be better to apply the > > follow up fix > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160714175521.3675e3d6@gandalf.local.home -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs