From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net>,
kbuild-all@01.org, James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] security/yama/yama_lsm.o: warning: objtool: report_access()+0x210: function has unreachable instruction
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:12:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160720011216.GO17027@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201607192204.fvKwcnpe%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Hi Jann,
Sorry please ignore this one -- it looks like false warning from old
gcc 4.4 and 4.6 -- we just enabled old compiler tests triggered 10k
these warnings..
Thanks,
Fengguang
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:20:05PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
>tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>head: 47ef4ad2684d380dd6d596140fb79395115c3950
>commit: dca6b4149181baaa363b9a7ce7c550840bb3bc83 Yama: fix double-spinlock and user access in atomic context
>date: 8 weeks ago
>config: x86_64-randconfig-s2-07191718 (attached as .config)
>compiler: gcc-4.4 (Debian 4.4.7-8) 4.4.7
>reproduce:
> git checkout dca6b4149181baaa363b9a7ce7c550840bb3bc83
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> make ARCH=x86_64
>
>All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
>>> security/yama/yama_lsm.o: warning: objtool: report_access()+0x210: function has unreachable instruction
>
>---
>0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
>https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
>_______________________________________________
>kbuild-all mailing list
>kbuild-all@lists.01.org
>https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/kbuild-all
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-20 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-19 14:20 kbuild test robot
2016-07-20 1:12 ` Fengguang Wu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160720011216.GO17027@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=james.l.morris@oracle.com \
--cc=jann@thejh.net \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®