From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
To: xlpang@redhat.com
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
luca.abeni@unitn.it
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] sched/deadline: remove useless param from setup_new_dl_entity
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 15:36:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160721143645.GI30584@e106622-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160721142106.GH30584@e106622-lin>
On 21/07/16 15:21, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 18/07/16 21:37, Xunlei Pang wrote:
> > On 2016/07/18 at 21:04, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > > On 15/07/16 18:39, Xunlei Pang wrote:
> > >> On 2016/07/13 at 18:58, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > > [...]
> > >
> > >> Since this is only called for queued cases now, there is no need to
> > >> check boosted stuff here. As enqueue_task(ENQUEUE_REPLENISH)
> > >> is called before check_class_changed() in rt_mutex_setprio().
> > >>
> > > But we don't do the same in setscheduler, right?
> >
> > If p is deadline PI-boosted, setscheduler() won't call change its sched_class.
> > If p isn't deadline PI-boosted, then pi_task is NULL.
> >
> > So, I think the added code won't hit. Did I miss something?
> >
>
> No, I think you are right.
>
Oh, and we need to filter the call after rt_mutex_setprio has
already issued a replenishment.
> I'll shoot a v5 ASAP (I think I'll put a WARN_ON just in case).
>
> Best,
>
> - Juri
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-21 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-13 10:58 Juri Lelli
2016-07-15 10:39 ` Xunlei Pang
2016-07-18 13:04 ` Juri Lelli
2016-07-18 13:37 ` Xunlei Pang
2016-07-21 14:21 ` Juri Lelli
2016-07-21 14:36 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2016-07-21 14:46 ` Juri Lelli
2016-07-22 2:58 ` Xunlei Pang
2016-08-05 10:13 ` Juri Lelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160721143645.GI30584@e106622-lin \
--to=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.abeni@unitn.it \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=xlpang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®