From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751908AbcGUSBK (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jul 2016 14:01:10 -0400 Received: from heinz.dinsnail.net ([85.214.155.104]:37396 "EHLO heinz.dinsnail.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751594AbcGUSBI (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jul 2016 14:01:08 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 19:27:12 +0200 From: Michael Weiser To: Mark Brown Cc: Olliver Schinagl , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, dev@linux-sunxi.org, Maxime Ripard , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] ARM: sun4i: spi: Allow transfers larger than FIFO size Message-ID: <20160721172712.GA10640@weiser.dinsnail.net> References: <1439062912-4405-1-git-send-email-oliver@schinagl.nl> <20160721112701.GB6610@weiser.dinsnail.net> <20160721163153.GO6509@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160721163153.GO6509@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-dinsnail.net-MailScanner-ID: u6LI08wq030188 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: michael@weiser.dinsnail.net Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Mark, On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 05:31:53PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > What is keeping the patch from being merged (i.e. into mainline)? > Someone needs to address whatever review comments there were on the last > version and submit it. That's my point: There don't seem to be any. v6 was resend with fixes to checkpatch niggles on v5: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-August/363073.html v5 addressed comments by Maxime on v4: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-April/244305.html http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-March/243995.html I can't find any comments on v5 or v6. -- Thanks, Michael