From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756196AbcGYV7L (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jul 2016 17:59:11 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:60471 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755902AbcGYV7H (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jul 2016 17:59:07 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 07:59:03 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Peter Zijlstra , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Jiri Olsa , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] perf changes for v4.8 Message-ID: <20160726075903.18bcef41@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: References: <20160725082838.GA16210@gmail.com> <20160725235330.07c231a3@canb.auug.org.au> <20160725151520.GA5030@gmail.com> <20160725153536.GA5715@gmail.com> <20160726072123.497240f2@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Linus, On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 14:45:53 -0700 Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > Actually, the perf tree on its own was enough to trigger the build > > problem, the luto-next tree was just what initially triggered the build > > failure in linux-next (I guess there is some missing dependency). > > After the build failed, I started including the perf tree directly > > before the tip tree and the build would fail when I merged that ... > > Ugh. It's merged in my tree now, because I thought it was ok. Can > somebody point me to the fix? I only affects cross building of the objtool and vdso2c tools (which is how I work). The latest version of the perf/core branch in the tip tree now has all the fixes, so I assume that Ingo will send another pull request. Unfortunately, that means that your tree is broken for me this morning ... but I will cope, I guess. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell