From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753539AbcGZECo (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2016 00:02:44 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:57238 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752821AbcGZECl (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2016 00:02:41 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 14:02:39 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Juergen Gross , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Stefano Stabellini , , , Xen Devel , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vitaly Kuznetsov Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the xen-tip tree with the tip tree Message-ID: <20160726140239.364b2281@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the xen-tip tree got a conflict in: arch/x86/xen/smp.c between commit: 4c9075835511 ("xen/x86: Move irq allocation from Xen smp_op.cpu_up()") from the tip tree and commit: ad5475f9faf5 ("x86/xen: use xen_vcpu_id mapping for HYPERVISOR_vcpu_op") from the xen-tip tree. I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell diff --cc arch/x86/xen/smp.c index 09d5cc062dbe,0b4d04c8ab4d..000000000000 --- a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c +++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c @@@ -486,7 -495,11 +493,7 @@@ static int xen_cpu_up(unsigned int cpu xen_pmu_init(cpu); - rc = HYPERVISOR_vcpu_op(VCPUOP_up, cpu, NULL); - rc = xen_smp_intr_init(cpu); - if (rc) - return rc; - + rc = HYPERVISOR_vcpu_op(VCPUOP_up, xen_vcpu_nr(cpu), NULL); BUG_ON(rc); while (cpu_report_state(cpu) != CPU_ONLINE)