From: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, lkp@01.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [LKP] More information please. Re: [fs] 54cc07a761: BUG: kernel test crashed
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 17:18:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160726211859.GB9577@codemonkey.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wpk8p49p.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 02:50:58PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Yes that's the right directions to follow. We'll make the reports more
> > understandable and the test/bisects more reliable.
>
> Thanks. Does trinity have a random seed it can export/import to rerun
> the same tests? I ask because there was a failure these tests caught
> that if the right kernel options was enabled was 100% reliable and it
> blamed a commit 10 patches down from the indicated commit.
It does log the random seed on startup, and can replay it with the -s option
There is some variance if you were to do two runs with the same seed back
to back, because on startup, it walks /proc & /sys, and they'd see different things
so for eg "read() from fd 100" might mean something entirely different.
But as the testbot runs a pretty minimal userspace, only runs trinity once,
and really early in boot, this point might not matter.
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-26 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <5793dfa5.mvXPj4LJOS0dlz3i%xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
2016-07-23 21:52 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-07-25 18:57 ` More information please. " Eric W. Biederman
2016-07-26 14:35 ` [LKP] " Fengguang Wu
2016-07-26 14:52 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-07-26 15:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-07-26 19:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-07-26 21:18 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2016-07-26 21:15 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160726211859.GB9577@codemonkey.org.uk \
--to=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome