From: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
To: "Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
Cc: Mario_Limonciello@dell.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dell-wmi: Add events created by Dell Rugged 2-in-1s
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 09:38:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160727163857.GA2565@f23x64.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201607271805.57123@pali>
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 06:05:57PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 July 2016 17:55:09 Mario_Limonciello@dell.com wrote:
> > > Hi! I'm not sure if KEY_PROG1/2/3 are good names here as we already
> > > use
> > >
> > >those for other actions (see bios_to_linux_keycode). Also there is:
> > I had missed this, do you have some recommendations on what would be
> > better codes to map this to?
>
> Problem is that I do not know when those KEY_PROG keys from
> bios_to_linux_keycode table are emitted. There are missing comments or
> description.
>
> Are you able to find out description for all those keys in that table?
> Maybe now (when linux key constants are extended), there could be better
> candidates...
>
> > I'll double check what the things that "were" mapping to KEY_PROG1
> > etc actually were. This might be a case of an expected clash if the
> > functions aren't in current generations.
> >
> > >/* Wifi Catcher */
> > >
> > > { KE_KEY, 0xe011, { KEY_PROG2 } },
> >
> > It's worth mentioning that Wifi Catcher hasn't been used for any Dell
> > laptops for a handful generations. The rugged 2in1's are current
> > generation that have these programmable buttons and don't have wifi
> > catcher.
>
> Anyway, what is "Wifi Catcher"? HW switch buttton which enable/disable
> wifi? Or something else?
>
> > So there should be no "real" clash here.
>
> Problem can be in future. This driver is unified for all Dell products
> with wmi interface and so future product could do some nasty things...
I suggest not worrying too much about unknown future platforms when it comes to
things like key names, we cannot predict this, and can address it when/if it
becomes a problem.
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-27 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-22 20:01 Mario Limonciello
2016-07-27 5:19 ` Darren Hart
2016-07-27 7:23 ` Pali Rohár
2016-07-27 15:55 ` Mario_Limonciello
2016-07-27 16:05 ` Pali Rohár
2016-07-27 16:38 ` Darren Hart [this message]
2016-07-27 19:03 ` Mario_Limonciello
2016-07-27 20:15 ` Pali Rohár
2016-07-27 22:43 ` Darren Hart
2016-07-27 23:07 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-07-28 15:52 ` Mario_Limonciello
2016-07-28 18:49 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-07-28 19:22 ` Pali Rohár
2016-08-01 22:41 ` Mario_Limonciello
2016-07-28 15:36 ` Mario_Limonciello
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160727163857.GA2565@f23x64.localdomain \
--to=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=Mario_Limonciello@dell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®