From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751532AbcG2Bpp (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2016 21:45:45 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:39298 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751036AbcG2Bpn convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2016 21:45:43 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 11:45:41 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Dave Airlie Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Chris Wilson Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree Message-ID: <20160729114541.038fcf4e@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Dave, Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c between commit: 194dc870a589 ("Add braces to avoid "ambiguous ‘else’" compiler warnings") from Linus' tree and commit: 24f1d3cc0997 ("drm/i915: Refactor execlists default context pinning") from the drm tree. I fixed it up (I just used the version from the drm tree) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell