From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753525AbcHBLLS (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 07:11:18 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:28979 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752777AbcHBLLH (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 07:11:07 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,459,1464678000"; d="scan'208";a="1006923737" From: Baole Ni To: linux@armlinux.org.uk Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@intel.com, baolex.ni@intel.com Subject: [PATCH 0002/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:33:27 +0800 Message-Id: <20160802103327.13880-1-baolex.ni@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.9.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu Signed-off-by: Baole Ni --- arch/arm/common/dmabounce.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/common/dmabounce.c b/arch/arm/common/dmabounce.c index 1143c4d..22d7a9a 100644 --- a/arch/arm/common/dmabounce.c +++ b/arch/arm/common/dmabounce.c @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static ssize_t dmabounce_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, device_info->bounce_count); } -static DEVICE_ATTR(dmabounce_stats, 0400, dmabounce_show, NULL); +static DEVICE_ATTR(dmabounce_stats, S_IRUSR, dmabounce_show, NULL); #endif -- 2.9.2