From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757426AbcHBShh (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 14:37:37 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:12624 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754417AbcHBLNH (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 07:13:07 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,459,1464678000"; d="scan'208";a="1028243531" From: Baole Ni To: ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, dalias@libc.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@intel.com, baolex.ni@intel.com, phacht@linux.vnet.ibm.com, keescook@chromium.org Subject: [PATCH 0027/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:35:26 +0800 Message-Id: <20160802103526.15569-1-baolex.ni@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.9.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu Signed-off-by: Baole Ni --- arch/sh/mm/alignment.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/sh/mm/alignment.c b/arch/sh/mm/alignment.c index ec2b253..6cb05b2 100644 --- a/arch/sh/mm/alignment.c +++ b/arch/sh/mm/alignment.c @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static int se_usermode = UM_WARN | UM_FIXUP; /* 0: no warning 1: print a warning message, disabled by default */ static int se_kernmode_warn; -core_param(alignment, se_usermode, int, 0600); +core_param(alignment, se_usermode, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR); void inc_unaligned_byte_access(void) { -- 2.9.2