From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S967720AbcHBRuD (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 13:50:03 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:10792 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756150AbcHBLny (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 07:43:54 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,460,1464678000"; d="scan'208";a="1028252394" From: Baole Ni To: michael.hennerich@analog.com, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, hal.rosenstock@gmail.com, dledford@redhat.com, sean.hefty@intel.com, bp@alien8.de Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@intel.com, baolex.ni@intel.com, haggaie@mellanox.com Subject: [PATCH 0277/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:55:55 +0800 Message-Id: <20160802105555.32276-1-baolex.ni@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.9.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu Signed-off-by: Baole Ni --- drivers/input/misc/adxl34x.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/adxl34x.c b/drivers/input/misc/adxl34x.c index 2b2d02f..dd5c8ff 100644 --- a/drivers/input/misc/adxl34x.c +++ b/drivers/input/misc/adxl34x.c @@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ static ssize_t adxl34x_disable_store(struct device *dev, return count; } -static DEVICE_ATTR(disable, 0664, adxl34x_disable_show, adxl34x_disable_store); +static DEVICE_ATTR(disable, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IWGRP | S_IROTH, adxl34x_disable_show, adxl34x_disable_store); static ssize_t adxl34x_calibrate_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static ssize_t adxl34x_calibrate_store(struct device *dev, return count; } -static DEVICE_ATTR(calibrate, 0664, +static DEVICE_ATTR(calibrate, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IWGRP | S_IROTH, adxl34x_calibrate_show, adxl34x_calibrate_store); static ssize_t adxl34x_rate_show(struct device *dev, @@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ static ssize_t adxl34x_rate_store(struct device *dev, return count; } -static DEVICE_ATTR(rate, 0664, adxl34x_rate_show, adxl34x_rate_store); +static DEVICE_ATTR(rate, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IWGRP | S_IROTH, adxl34x_rate_show, adxl34x_rate_store); static ssize_t adxl34x_autosleep_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) @@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ static ssize_t adxl34x_autosleep_store(struct device *dev, return count; } -static DEVICE_ATTR(autosleep, 0664, +static DEVICE_ATTR(autosleep, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IWGRP | S_IROTH, adxl34x_autosleep_show, adxl34x_autosleep_store); static ssize_t adxl34x_position_show(struct device *dev, @@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ static ssize_t adxl34x_write_store(struct device *dev, return count; } -static DEVICE_ATTR(write, 0664, NULL, adxl34x_write_store); +static DEVICE_ATTR(write, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IWGRP | S_IROTH, NULL, adxl34x_write_store); #endif static struct attribute *adxl34x_attributes[] = { -- 2.9.2